On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
>> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
>
> This version looks fine to me.
Excellent. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterpris
Robert Haas writes:
> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
This version looks fine to me.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
On 31 July 2010 07:58, Robert Haas wrote:
> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
>
> (There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
> I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
>
Applies fine
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
(There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Ente
