"Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh no,my point isn't on this line but on the line
> estate->es_result_relation_info = NULL;
Oh, I see --- this is mistakenly assuming that es_result_relation_info
*always* points at one of the Append's relations. So there are actually
two rel-r
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > While examining recursive use of catalog cache,I found
> > a refcnt leak of relations.
> > After further investigation,I found that the following seems
> > to be the cause.
>
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > While examining recursive use of catalog cache,I found
> > a refcnt leak of relations.
> > After further investigation,I found that the following seems
> > to be the cause.
>
> > [ in EndAppend() in nodeAppend.c
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While examining recursive use of catalog cache,I found
> a refcnt leak of relations.
> After further investigation,I found that the following seems
> to be the cause.
> [ in EndAppend() in nodeAppend.c ]
appendstate-> as_result_relation_info_list = NIL
Hi
While examining recursive use of catalog cache,I found
a refcnt leak of relations.
After further investigation,I found that the following seems
to be the cause.
[ in EndAppend() in nodeAppend.c ]
appendstate->as_result_relation_info_list = NIL;
/*
* This next step is critical to prevent En
