Re: [HACKERS] refcount leak warnings

2006-06-27 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a PL/Java user that performs some lengthy operations. Eventually, > he get warnings like: > WARNING: buffer refcount leak: [779] (rel=1663/16440/52989, blockNum=3, > flags=0x27, refcount=1 2) Look for ReadBuffer calls not matched by ReleaseBu

Re: [HACKERS] refcount leak warnings

2006-06-27 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:55:06PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > I have a PL/Java user that performs some lengthy operations. Eventually, > he get warnings like: > > WARNING: buffer refcount leak: [779] (rel=1663/16440/52989, blockNum=3, > flags=0x27, refcount=1 2) I think the comment about f

[HACKERS] refcount leak warnings

2006-06-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
I have a PL/Java user that performs some lengthy operations. Eventually, he get warnings like: WARNING: buffer refcount leak: [779] (rel=1663/16440/52989, blockNum=3, flags=0x27, refcount=1 2) I traced this to the function PrintBufferLeakWarning. AFAICS, it's only called from the function Re