"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Would you poke into it and see why?
> I can, but I'm not sure what you want me to do -
It shouldn't be that hard to find why you're getting zeroes instead of
expected results. I'd look at those cases first.
regards
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Latest CVS, timetz and horology is failing...
Would you poke into it and see why?
I made some recent adjustments to the rounding code in timetz, but I
didn't expect any portability issues to surface...
regards, tom l
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Latest CVS, timetz and horology is failing...
>
> Would you poke into it and see why?
I can, but I'm not sure what you want me to do - I'm not really familiar
with it all bar the stuff I attached to the email...
Chris
-
Latest CVS, timetz and horology is failing...
parallel group (13 tests): text name varchar float4 char int2 boolean oid
int8 float8 bit int4 numeric
boolean ... ok
char ... ok
name ... ok
varchar ... ok
text
