This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=597
caches the cache because, I guess, the cache is slow.
Simon asked, What is making the first cache so slow?. Pavel does not know,
nor how to fix it, and nobody else responded.
So my question is: is someone going to take a
Pavel, I have not taken on your patch for review, but I was reading the history
of it, and one question popped up:
If you are allocating a new cache, what if the array is really big, will 1st
cache + your cache get bigger than work_mem? (or are array op's not
constrained by work_mem? Sorry,
Hello
2011/9/5 Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net:
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=597
caches the cache because, I guess, the cache is slow.
Simon asked, What is making the first cache so slow?. Pavel does not
know, nor how to fix it, and nobody else
Hello
2011/9/5 Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net:
Pavel, I have not taken on your patch for review, but I was reading the
history of it, and one question popped up:
If you are allocating a new cache, what if the array is really big, will 1st
cache + your cache get bigger than work_mem? (or
Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net writes:
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=597
caches the cache because, I guess, the cache is slow.
Simon asked, What is making the first cache so slow?. Pavel does not know,
nor how to fix it, and nobody else responded.
