On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>> > It seems to me that having ACL_OBJECT_* symbols alongside OBJECT_*
>> > symbols is not
Peter,
* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> It seems to me that having ACL_OBJECT_* symbols alongside OBJECT_*
> symbols is not useful and leads to duplication. Digging around in the
> past suggests that we used to have a lot of these command-specific
> symbols but got
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> > It seems to me that having ACL_OBJECT_* symbols alongside OBJECT_*
> > symbols is not useful and leads to duplication. Digging around in the
> > past suggests that we used to
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> It seems to me that having ACL_OBJECT_* symbols alongside OBJECT_*
> symbols is not useful and leads to duplication. Digging around in the
> past suggests that we used to have a lot of these
It seems to me that having ACL_OBJECT_* symbols alongside OBJECT_*
symbols is not useful and leads to duplication. Digging around in the
past suggests that we used to have a lot of these command-specific
symbols but got rid of them over time, except that the ACL stuff was
never touched. The