On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Please reply to the original thread in future (even if the Reply-to
Message-ID is the same, I see this as a separate thread).
sorry about that, when i added review to the subject gmail removed
the thread info.
for
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
It seemed neater to me to create a new flag, so that in principle any
vacuum() code path can request autovacuum_work_mem, rather than having
