On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I have committed this patch with a few changes.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> First, I felt that there was little point in showing this detail
>> only in verbose mode; indeed, it seems like that could be confusing
>> in some circums
Robert Haas wrote:
> I have committed this patch with a few changes.
Thanks.
> First, I felt that there was little point in showing this detail
> only in verbose mode; indeed, it seems like that could be confusing
> in some circumstances. (I thought I checked this was an index not
> a const
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> The patch is in context diff format and applies cleanly. No doc
> changes were included. Arguably there should be a mention in the
> documentation for psql's \d+ commend, but since the number of child
> tables and the display of reloptions
The patch is in context diff format and applies cleanly. No doc
changes were included. Arguably there should be a mention in the
documentation for psql's \d+ commend, but since the number of child
tables and the display of reloptions aren't mentioned, perhaps we're
not trying to list *all* the di
