Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, I have no great objection to the proposed patch, I'm just dubious
> that it's really worth the trouble. If you do go through with it, I'd
> suggest adding an installcheck-with variant.
>
> In the bikeshedding department, maybe "-tests" instead of "-with"?
No objection
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 01/26/2014 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, the tests themselves don't take that long, especially in parallel
>> mode. If you need to speed up repeated testing, it's more profitable to
>> avoid the install/initdb overhead of a "make check". I use a small
>> script t
On 01/26/2014 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I've often wanted to be able to run "make check" and just have it run
the small number of tests I am interested in. Here's a tiny patch along
those lines. It creates a new targe which I have called "check-with" for
want of a better
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> I've often wanted to be able to run "make check" and just have it run
> the small number of tests I am interested in. Here's a tiny patch along
> those lines. It creates a new targe which I have called "check-with" for
> want of a better name. And with it I can do:
>
On 01/26/2014 12:01 PM, Florian Pflug wrote:
On Jan26, 2014, at 17:47 , Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I've often wanted to be able to run "make check" and just have it run the small number of
tests I am interested in. Here's a tiny patch along those lines. It creates a new targe which I
have called
On Jan26, 2014, at 17:47 , Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I've often wanted to be able to run "make check" and just have it run the
> small number of tests I am interested in. Here's a tiny patch along those
> lines. It creates a new targe which I have called "check-with" for want of a
> better name.
2014-01-26 Andrew Dunstan
>
> I've often wanted to be able to run "make check" and just have it run the
> small number of tests I am interested in. Here's a tiny patch along those
> lines. It creates a new targe which I have called "check-with" for want of
> a better name. And with it I can do:
>
I've often wanted to be able to run "make check" and just have it run
the small number of tests I am interested in. Here's a tiny patch along
those lines. It creates a new targe which I have called "check-with" for
want of a better name. And with it I can do:
$ make check-with TESTS="json
