Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: KaiGai Kohei wrote: The todo list says, as follows: * Binary Data o Add security checks for large objects http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data Is anyone working on? or interested in? OK, it seems to me

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: KaiGai Kohei wrote: The todo list says, as follows: * Binary Data o Add security checks for large objects http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data Is

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: KaiGai Kohei wrote: The todo list says, as follows: * Binary Data o Add security checks for large

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, no? It depends on your definition. The lo interface is pretty much to objects on the file system directly.

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:31:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, no? It depends on your definition. The lo

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread KaiGai Kohei
David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:31:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, no? It depends on your definition.

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:38:59AM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:31:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: MED is management of external data, whereas

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread KaiGai Kohei
KaiGai Kohei wrote: KaiGai Kohei wrote: The todo list says, as follows: * Binary Data o Add security checks for large objects http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data Is anyone working on? or interested in? OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item. I'll also

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-22 Thread KaiGai Kohei
David Fetter wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:38:59AM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:31:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: MED is management of

Re: [HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-21 Thread KaiGai Kohei
KaiGai Kohei wrote: The todo list says, as follows: * Binary Data o Add security checks for large objects http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data Is anyone working on? or interested in? OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item. I'll also submit this feature on the

[HACKERS] security checks for largeobjects?

2009-06-18 Thread KaiGai Kohei
The todo list says, as follows: * Binary Data o Add security checks for large objects http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data Is anyone working on? or interested in? Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers