I wrote:
> OK, I'll take care of it (since I now realize that the inconsistency
> is my own fault --- I committed that GUC not you). It's unclear what
> this will do for Peter's complaint though.
On closer inspection, the answer is "nothing", because the select_parallel
test overrides the default
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, sure, but at any reasonable value of min_parallel_relation_size
>> that won't be a factor. The question here is whether we want the default
>> value to be platform-independent. I notice that both config.sgml and
>>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Possibly we ought to change things so that the default value of
>>> min_parallel_relation_size is a fixed number of bytes rather
>>> than a fixed number of blocks. Not
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Possibly we ought to change things so that the default value of
>> min_parallel_relation_size is a fixed number of bytes rather
>> than a fixed number of blocks. Not sure though.
> The reason why this was originally recko
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Possibly we ought to change things so that the default value of
> > min_parallel_relation_size is a fixed number of bytes rather
> > than a fixed number of blocks. Not sure though.
>
> The reason why this was originally re
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Possibly we ought to change things so that the default value of
> min_parallel_relation_size is a fixed number of bytes rather
> than a fixed number of blocks. Not sure though.
The reason why this was originally reckoned in blocks is because the
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> When building with --with-blocksize=16, the select_parallel test fails
> with this difference:
> explain (costs off)
> select sum(parallel_restricted(unique1)) from tenk1
> group by(parallel_restricted(unique1));
> - QUERY PLAN
> --
When building with --with-blocksize=16, the select_parallel test fails
with this difference:
explain (costs off)
select sum(parallel_restricted(unique1)) from tenk1
group by(parallel_restricted(unique1));
- QUERY PLAN
--
