Re: [HACKERS] set search_path failure

2002-08-19 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The man page says: >SET variable { TO | = } { value | 'value' | DEFAULT } > So user naturally thinks > set search_path to 'public,s1'; > is a correct syntax, no? The man page needs improvement --- some variables accept a list of values now. In

Re: [HACKERS] set search_path failure

2002-08-18 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Try 'public','s1' perhaps... Wao, this is confusing:-) The man page says: SET variable { TO | = } { value | 'value' | DEFAULT } And: test=# show search_path; search_path - public, s1 (1 row) So user naturally thinks set search_path to 'public,s1'; is a correct synta

Re: [HACKERS] set search_path failure

2002-08-18 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Try 'public','s1' perhaps... Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tatsuo Ishii > Sent: Monday, 19 August 2002 2:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [HACKERS] set search_path failure >

[HACKERS] set search_path failure

2002-08-18 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
I'm seeing this: test=# create schema s1; CREATE SCHEMA test=# set search_path to 'public, s1'; ERROR: Namespace "public, s1" does not exist Am I missing something? -- Tatsuo Ishii ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FA