Hi,
At Sun, 25 Jun 2017 09:20:10 +0900 (JST), Tatsuo Ishii
wrote in <20170625.092010.542143642647288693.t-is...@sraoss.co.jp>
> > I don't have a clear opinion on this particular issue, but I think we
> > should have clarity on why particular files or code exist. So why do
> > these files exist
> I don't have a clear opinion on this particular issue, but I think we
> should have clarity on why particular files or code exist. So why do
> these files exist and the others don't? Is it just the license?
I think so.
Many of those files are from http://ftp.unicode.org. There's no
license de
On 6/23/17 11:15, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> For clarity, I personally perfer to keep all the source text file
>> in the repository, especially so that we can detect changes of
>> them. But since we decide that at least most of them not to be
>> there (from a reason of license), I just don't see a reas
> For clarity, I personally perfer to keep all the source text file
> in the repository, especially so that we can detect changes of
> them. But since we decide that at least most of them not to be
> there (from a reason of license), I just don't see a reason to
> keep only the rest even without th
At Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:04:26 +0900 (JST), Tatsuo Ishii
wrote in <20170623.100426.157023025943107410.t-is...@sraoss.co.jp>
> > Hm. I am wondering about licensing issues here to keep those files in
> > the tree. I am no lawyer.
>
> Of course. Regarding euc-jis-2004-std.txt and sjis-0213-2004-std.t
> Hm. I am wondering about licensing issues here to keep those files in
> the tree. I am no lawyer.
Of course. Regarding euc-jis-2004-std.txt and sjis-0213-2004-std.txt,
it seems safe to keep them.
> ## Date: 13 May 2006
> ## License:
> ##Copyright (C) 2001 earth...@tama.or.jp, All Rights Res
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> I think we should keep the original .txt files because:
Hm. I am wondering about licensing issues here to keep those files in
the tree. I am no lawyer.
> - It allows to track the changes in the original file if we decide to
> change the ma
>> Why do you believe so?
>
> Unicode/Makefile includes that:
> euc-jis-2004-std.txt sjis-0213-2004-std.txt:
> $(DOWNLOAD) http://x0213.org/codetable/$(@F)
>
> So those files ought to be downloaded when rebuilding the maps, and
> they should not be in the tree. In short, I think that Hori
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Hi, I happned to notice that backend/utils/mb/Unicode directory
>> contains two encoding authority files, which I believe are not to
>> be there.
(Worked on that with Horiguchi-san a couple of weeks back.)
>> euc-jis-2004-std.txt
>> sjis-02
> Hi, I happned to notice that backend/utils/mb/Unicode directory
> contains two encoding authority files, which I believe are not to
> be there.
>
> euc-jis-2004-std.txt
> sjis-0213-2004-std.txt
Why do you believe so?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
> Hi, I happned to notice that backend/utils/mb/Unicode directory
> contains two encoding authority files, which I believe are not to
> be there.
>
> euc-jis-2004-std.txt
> sjis-0213-2004-std.txt
>
> And what is more astonishing, make distcl
Hi, I happned to notice that backend/utils/mb/Unicode directory
contains two encoding authority files, which I believe are not to
be there.
euc-jis-2004-std.txt
sjis-0213-2004-std.txt
And what is more astonishing, make distclean didn't its work.
| $ make distclean
| rm -f
The Makefile there is
12 matches
Mail list logo
