On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I spend a little bit of time analyzing this today and it appears to me
> that all of the calls to emode_for_corrupt_record() arrive via
> ReadRecord(), which itself takes an emode argument that is always
> passed by the caller as either LOG or
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> It means that we can't prevent people from configuring their tools to
>>> ignore important warning. We can't prevent them rom ignoring ERROR or
>>> FATAL either...
>
>> My point is that most to
