Re: [HACKERS] single-user vs standalone in docs and messages

2013-06-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 15:10 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, > while the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user > mode", > and in fact "standalone" does not appear on that page. > > This tries to standardize the o

Re: [HACKERS] single-user vs standalone in docs and messages

2013-06-14 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: > Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, while > the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user mode", and in > fact "standalone" does not appear on that page. > > This tries to standardize the other

Re: [HACKERS] single-user vs standalone in docs and messages

2013-06-13 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Jeff Janes escribió: > I think I did the right thing with the message translation files, but > I can't figure out how to test that. Don't do that. These files are automatically generated. Just leave them alone and translators will get to them in time. -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://w

[HACKERS] single-user vs standalone in docs and messages

2013-06-13 Thread Jeff Janes
Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, while the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user mode", and in fact "standalone" does not appear on that page. This tries to standardize the other locations to use "single-user". I think I did the right thi