On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 06:15:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of
determining # of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether
or not sort_mem is set to a good value?
As of
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 06:15:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of
determining # of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether
or not
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:50:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 06:15:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of
determining # of
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level
NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much
in-your-face if it
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 18:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level
NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much
in-your-face
Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level
NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much
in-your-face if it were on all the time. Does
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of
determining # of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether
or not sort_mem is set to a good value?
I don't think there is currently, but wondering how hard it would be to
get something like this added ... ?
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of
determining # of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether
or not sort_mem is set to a good value?
As of 8.1 you could turn on trace_sort to collect some data about
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level
NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much
in-your-face if it were on all
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level
NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much
in-your-face if it were on all the time. Does anyone think it'd be
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of
determining # of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether
or not sort_mem is set to a good value?
As of 8.1 you could turn on
Satoshi,
And I want to get statistic info through system views, like pg_statio_*.
I don't think anyone disagrees with that. It's just a little too late to
get in for 8.1.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of
Josh Berkus wrote:
And I want to get statistic info through system views, like pg_statio_*.
I don't think anyone disagrees with that. It's just a little too late to
get in for 8.1.
Thanks for comment. I hope 8.2 will get it.
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't that what pg_stat_database reports with its xact_commit and
xact_rollback values?
Ah yes. Doh :)
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Isn't that what pg_stat_database reports with its xact_commit and
xact_rollback values?
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of determining
# of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether or not
15 matches
Mail list logo
