Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 29 March 2016 at 22:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in
> > src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test,
> > or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get
> > run
On 29 March 2016 at 22:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in
> src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test,
> or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get
> run all the time rather than just w
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in
> src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test,
> or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get
> run all the time rather than j
I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in
src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test,
or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get
run all the time rather than just when somebody feels like it (which is
probably almost never,