On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> wrote:
>> On 10.10.2013 15:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The behavior of pg_trgm's similarity function seems strange. Is this
>>> intentional?
>>>
>>> I was thinking that t
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 10.10.2013 15:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The behavior of pg_trgm's similarity function seems strange. Is this
>> intentional?
>>
>> I was thinking that the following three calls of the similarity function
>> return
>> the
On 10.10.2013 15:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
The behavior of pg_trgm's similarity function seems strange. Is this
intentional?
I was thinking that the following three calls of the similarity function return
the same number because the second argument is just the three characters
contained in the
Hi,
The behavior of pg_trgm's similarity function seems strange. Is this
intentional?
I was thinking that the following three calls of the similarity function return
the same number because the second argument is just the three characters
contained in the first argument in every calls.
=# SELECT