Re: [HACKERS] system info functions

2006-07-08 Thread Jim Nasby
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Conway Sent: 04 July 2006 05:53 To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: [HACKERS] system info functions (1) The docs claim that pg_get_viewdef() returns

Re: [HACKERS] system info functions

2006-07-04 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" writes: >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Conway >> Should we change the documentation, or the implementation of >> pg_get_viewdef()? > Documentation, unless we want to break apps that use the function. ... such as pg_dump. regards, tom lane ---

Re: [HACKERS] system info functions

2006-07-04 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Conway > Sent: 04 July 2006 05:53 > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] system info functions > > (1) The docs claim that pg_get_viewdef() returns th

[HACKERS] system info functions

2006-07-03 Thread Neil Conway
(1) The docs claim that pg_get_viewdef() returns the "CREATE VIEW command for view", but that is clearly not the case: postgres=# create view v1 as select 1; CREATE VIEW postgres=# select pg_get_viewdef('v1'::regclass::oid); pg_get_viewdef SELECT 1; (1 row) Should we change th