OK, Heikki still believe the behavior below is a bug. Can I get
feedback from anyone else on this? TODO item?
---
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Sushant Sinha wrote:
> > > Patch #2. I think this is a straigt forward bug f
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Sushant Sinha wrote:
The default headline generation function is complicated. It checks a lot
of cases to determine the best headline to be displayed. So Heikki's
examples just say that headline generation function may not be very
intuitive. However, his examples were not af
Sushant Sinha wrote:
> The default headline generation function is complicated. It checks a lot
> of cases to determine the best headline to be displayed. So Heikki's
> examples just say that headline generation function may not be very
> intuitive. However, his examples were not affected by the bu
The default headline generation function is complicated. It checks a lot
of cases to determine the best headline to be displayed. So Heikki's
examples just say that headline generation function may not be very
intuitive. However, his examples were not affected by the bug.
Because of the bug, hlcov
Uh, where are we on this? I see the same output in CVS HEAD as Heikki,
and I assume he thought at least one of them was wrong. ;-)
---
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Sushant Sinha wrote:
> > Patch #2. I think this is a straig
I remember about that but right now I havn't time to make final review. Sorry.
Will return soon.
Sushant Sinha wrote:
Any status updates on the following patches?
1. Fragments in tsearch2 headlines:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00043.php
2. Bug in hlCover:
http://ar
Sushant Sinha wrote:
Patch #2. I think this is a straigt forward bug fix.
Yes, I think you're right. In hlCover(), *q is 0 when the only match is
the first item in the text, and we shouldn't bail out with "return
false" in that case.
But there seems to be something else going on here as wel
Patch #1. Teodor was fine with the previous version of the patch. After that
I modified it slightly to allow a FragmentDelimiter option and Teodor may
have to look at that.
Patch #2. I think this is a straigt forward bug fix.
-Sushant.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PRO
Sushant Sinha escribió:
> Any status updates on the following patches?
>
> 1. Fragments in tsearch2 headlines:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00043.php
>
> 2. Bug in hlCover:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00089.php
Are these ready for review
Any status updates on the following patches?
1. Fragments in tsearch2 headlines:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00043.php
2. Bug in hlCover:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00089.php
-Sushant.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hacke
10 matches
Mail list logo