> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 1:47 PM
> To: Roberts, Jon; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] timestamp format bug
>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:45 PM,
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:34 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roberts,
Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doesn't round the zeros off for timestamp
Sorry to have been so slow, but I think this is the crux of it:
A timestamp represents a moment in time, without storing any
precision i
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:45 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roberts,
Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So on your db, run this query:
> select sub.t1, to_char(t1, '-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.us') as char_t1
> from
> (
> select timestamp'2008-01-31 12:31:40.50' as t1
> ) sub
>
>
> I b
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:33 PM
> To: Roberts, Jon; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] timestamp format bug
>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:28 PM,
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:34 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roberts,
Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If not to_char, what is the preferred method to convert a timestamp to a
> string?
Your original post showed to_char apparently doing what you wanted, no?
> select to_char(date,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:48 AM
> To: Kevin Grittner
> Cc: Roberts, Jon; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp format bug
>
> "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAI
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:28 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roberts,
Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default timestamp format appears to be -mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.ms
Not to me:
select now();
now
---
2008-01-31 12:31:40.568746-06
(1 row
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:48 AM
> To: Roberts, Jon; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp format bug
>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:34 AM,
"Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:34 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roberts,
> Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> These two fields should be consistent because they should be formatted
>> the same way.
> Why would you think that?
Indeed the whole
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:34 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roberts,
Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> select to_char(date, '-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.ms') as char,
>date
> from (select timestamp'2008-01-30 15:06:21.560' as date) sub
>
> "2008-01-30 15:06:21.560";"2008-01-30 15
select to_char(date, '-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss.ms') as char,
date
from (select timestamp'2008-01-30 15:06:21.560' as date) sub
"2008-01-30 15:06:21.560";"2008-01-30 15:06:21.56"
Why does the timestamp field truncate the 0 but when I show the
timestamp as a character in the default timest
11 matches
Mail list logo
