Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, you're right. It strange, but NUM_S missing there. The conversion
> from string to number is less stable part of formatting.c...
> The patch is in the attachment.
This patch causes the regression tests to fail. I think you need to
consider the to_char
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 17:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SELECT to_number('485-', '999S');
> > to_number
> > ---
> >485
>
> > Is this a bug or intentional?
>
> Tracing through this, it looks like the problem is that NUM_processor()
> h
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SELECT to_number('485-', '999S');
> to_number
> ---
>485
> Is this a bug or intentional?
Tracing through this, it looks like the problem is that NUM_processor()
has no switch case for NUM_S (nor does the default case raise an error,
This is from one of the examples in the documentation:
SELECT to_char(-485, '999S');
to_char
-
485-
The reverse doesn't work as well:
SEKLECT to_number('485-', '999S');
to_number
---
485
Is this a bug or intentional?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.or
