Re: [HACKERS] tuple-routing and constraint violation error message, revisited

2017-04-10 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Amit Langote > wrote: >> Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771ea7 [1] that passing the original slot >> (one containing the tuple formatted per root partitioned table's tupdesc) >> to ExecConstraints(), but tha

Re: [HACKERS] tuple-routing and constraint violation error message, revisited

2017-04-10 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Amit Langote wrote: > Hi, > > Last message regarding this was by Robert on the original partitioning thread: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZjGzSM5WwnyapFaw3GxnDLWh7pm8Xiz8_QWQnUQy%3DSCA%40mail.gmail.com > > Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771ea7

Re: [HACKERS] tuple-routing and constraint violation error message, revisited

2017-04-09 Thread Noah Misch
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:13:03AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > Last message regarding this was by Robert on the original partitioning thread: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZjGzSM5WwnyapFaw3GxnDLWh7pm8Xiz8_QWQnUQy%3DSCA%40mail.gmail.com > > Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771e

[HACKERS] tuple-routing and constraint violation error message, revisited

2017-03-30 Thread Amit Langote
Hi, Last message regarding this was by Robert on the original partitioning thread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZjGzSM5WwnyapFaw3GxnDLWh7pm8Xiz8_QWQnUQy%3DSCA%40mail.gmail.com Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771ea7 [1] that passing the original slot (one containing the tuple for