On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>> Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771ea7 [1] that passing the original slot
>> (one containing the tuple formatted per root partitioned table's tupdesc)
>> to ExecConstraints(), but tha
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last message regarding this was by Robert on the original partitioning thread:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZjGzSM5WwnyapFaw3GxnDLWh7pm8Xiz8_QWQnUQy%3DSCA%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771ea7
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:13:03AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Last message regarding this was by Robert on the original partitioning thread:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZjGzSM5WwnyapFaw3GxnDLWh7pm8Xiz8_QWQnUQy%3DSCA%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771e
Hi,
Last message regarding this was by Robert on the original partitioning thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZjGzSM5WwnyapFaw3GxnDLWh7pm8Xiz8_QWQnUQy%3DSCA%40mail.gmail.com
Summary is: We decided in f1b4c771ea7 [1] that passing the original slot
(one containing the tuple for