On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:37:57AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:46:58AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> >> I might try to find the segments leading up to the over
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:37:57AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:46:58AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> >> I might try to find the segments leading up to the overflow point and
> >> try xlogdumping them to see what we
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:46:58AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> I might try to find the segments leading up to the overflow point and
>> try xlogdumping them to see what we can see.
>
> That would be helpful to see.
>
> Just to grasp at yet-fli
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:46:58AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> I might try to find the segments leading up to the overflow point and
> try xlogdumping them to see what we can see.
That would be helpful to see.
Just to grasp at yet-flimsier straws, could you post (URL preferred, else
private mai
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:07:30AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> It seems like this has reproduced once more. And once again, there
>> doesn't appear to be any funny business in pg_control (but the structs
>> are pasted here for your re-check),
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:07:30AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> It seems like this has reproduced once more. And once again, there
> doesn't appear to be any funny business in pg_control (but the structs
> are pasted here for your re-check), and there are successful sensical
> updates to it. The
It seems like this has reproduced once more. And once again, there
doesn't appear to be any funny business in pg_control (but the structs
are pasted here for your re-check), and there are successful sensical
updates to it. The primary is running 9.0.6.
However, we do have a new piece of data: th
