While working on some code today, I noticed that RELKIND_UNCATALOGED
appears to serve no useful purpose. In the few places where we check
for it at all, we treat it in exactly the same way as
RELKIND_RELATION. It seems that it's only purpose is to serve as a
placeholder inside each newly-created
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
While working on some code today, I noticed that RELKIND_UNCATALOGED
appears to serve no useful purpose. In the few places where we check
for it at all, we treat it in exactly the same way as
RELKIND_RELATION. It seems that it's only purpose is to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.
I think there are probably some places to fix in the docs too.
catalogs.sgml doesn't include
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.
I think there are probably some places to fix in
