On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
At the moment, this is probably just an experiment that shows where
refactoring and better abstractions might be suitable if we want to
support multiple locale libraries. If we want to pursue ICU, I think
this could be a
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:43:28AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
In light of the recent discussions about using ICU on OS X, I looked
into the Core Foundation locale functions (Core Foundation = traditional
Mac API in OS X, as opposed to the Unix/POSIX APIs).
Attached is a proof of concept
On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Gotta say, I’m thrilled to see movement on this front, and especially pleased
to see how consensus seems to be building around an abstracted interface to
keep options open. This platform-specific example really highlights the need
for it (I
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Gotta say, I’m thrilled to see movement on this front, and especially
pleased to see how consensus seems to be building around an abstracted
interface to keep options
On Nov 28, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
At the moment, this is probably just an experiment that shows where
refactoring and better abstractions might be suitable if we want to
support multiple locale libraries. If we want to pursue ICU, I think
this could be a
In light of the recent discussions about using ICU on OS X, I looked
into the Core Foundation locale functions (Core Foundation = traditional
Mac API in OS X, as opposed to the Unix/POSIX APIs).
Attached is a proof of concept patch that just about works for the
sorting aspects. (The ctype
