Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier writes: On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for v7.2.2, which I hope is okay? Probably not, because the version number needs to be changed and they need to be

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-08 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for v7.2.2, which I hope is okay? Probably not, because the version number needs to be changed and they need to be rebuilt for each release. should I

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier writes: Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for v7.2.2, which I hope is okay? Probably not, because the version number needs to be changed and they need to be rebuilt for each release. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-03 Thread Tom Lane
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Builds fine here for RPM usage. Got an odd diff in the triggers regression test: did we drop a NOTICE? If so, the regression output should probably have been changed too. No, we didn't change anything, and the 7.2 regression tests passed for me on

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-03 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:29 am, Lamar Owen wrote: RPMs will be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow morning after I get to work; it will depend on how much upload bandwidth I can get out of this dialup. It appears to be running OK, so I may let it run. RPMS uploaded into the usual

[HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for v7.2.2, which I hope is okay? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-02 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for v7.2.2, which I hope is okay? Sources look okay from here. Didn't look at the built-docs files. regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 11:52 pm, Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for v7.2.2, which I hope is okay? Sources look okay from here. Didn't look at the built-docs files. Builds fine here for

Re: [HACKERS] v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...

2002-10-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:29 am, Lamar Owen wrote: RPMs will be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow morning after I get to work; it will depend on how much upload bandwidth I can get out of this dialup. It appears to be running OK, so I may let it run. After I get to work. Too many