> > Perhaps one could just create a "PostgreSQL Powertools" section on
> > techdocs, naming the packages and where to get them. This would
> > eliminate the need to maintain a package that just duplicates other
> > packages...
>
> Let ye-old package managers make a shell package which simply point
On a different note ... if anyone out there would like to maintain/package
up binaries for various OS similar to what Lamar does with RPMs, I'd love
to see us extend our binaries section on the ftp server ...
On 16 Oct 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:05, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Thomas Swan wrote:
> >
> > Justin Clift wrote:
>
> > > Ok. Wonder if it's worth someone creating a "PostgreSQL Powertools"
> > > type of package, that includes in one download all of these nifty
> > > tools (pg_autotune, oid2name, etc) that would be b
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:05, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:56, Robert Treat wrote:
> > Perhaps one could just create a "PostgreSQL Powertools" section on
> > techdocs, naming the packages and where to get them. This would
> > eliminate the need to maintain a package that just duplic
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 05:05 pm, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:56, Robert Treat wrote:
> > Perhaps one could just create a "PostgreSQL Powertools" section on
> > techdocs, naming the packages and where to get them. This would
> > eliminate the need to maintain a package that j
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:56, Robert Treat wrote:
> Perhaps one could just create a "PostgreSQL Powertools" section on
> techdocs, naming the packages and where to get them. This would
> eliminate the need to maintain a package that just duplicates other
> packages...
Let ye-old package managers m
Perhaps one could just create a "PostgreSQL Powertools" section on
techdocs, naming the packages and where to get them. This would
eliminate the need to maintain a package that just duplicates other
packages...
Robert Treat
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:00, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Thomas Swan wrote:
> Thomas Swan wrote:
>
> Justin Clift wrote:
> > Ok. Wonder if it's worth someone creating a "PostgreSQL Powertools"
> > type of package, that includes in one download all of these nifty
> > tools (pg_autotune, oid2name, etc) that would be beneficial to have
> > compiled and already available.
Justin Clift wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
Not going to happen ... there are oodles of "not big, but useful" pieces
of software out there that we could include ... but th epoint of Gborg is
you download the main repository, and then you go to gborg to look for the
add-ons you mi
Just a reminder, we are not using this tag. All 7.3 patches are going
to HEAD. Once we decide to split the tree for 7.4, we will update this
branch and announce it is ready to be used.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> As
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
>
> Not going to happen ... there are oodles of "not big, but useful" pieces
> of software out there that we could include ... but th epoint of Gborg is
> you download the main repository, and then you go to gborg to look for the
> add-ons you might like to have ...
Ok.
Not going to happen ... there are oodles of "not big, but useful" pieces
of software out there that we could include ... but th epoint of Gborg is
you download the main repository, and then you go to gborg to look for the
add-ons you might like to have ...
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Justin Clift wr
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
>
> As was previously discussed (and now that I'm mostly back from the dead
> ... damn colds) I've just branched off REL7_3_STABLE ... all future beta's
> will be made based off of that branch, so that development may resume on
> the main branch ...
What is the attitude
As was previously discussed (and now that I'm mostly back from the dead
... damn colds) I've just branched off REL7_3_STABLE ... all future beta's
will be made based off of that branch, so that development may resume on
the main branch ...
So, for those doing commits or anoncvs, remember that th
14 matches
Mail list logo
