> There would be *zero* activity on a table undergoing vacuum full, unless
> your app has found a way around vacuum full's exclusive lock. You sure
> this wasn't a plain vacuum?
Hmm...correct. So I don't know what happened.
> > Then vacuum full failed after a while:
> > ERROR: simple_heap_upda
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was running a long-running vacuum full, and then halfway thru that our
> background vacuum process started. As well as this, there was light
> activity on a users table from which vacuum full was removing 9 rows.
There would be *zero*
Hi,
I was running a long-running vacuum full, and then halfway thru that our
background vacuum process started. As well as this, there was light
activity on a users table from which vacuum full was removing 9 rows.
Then vacuum full failed after a while:
ERROR: simple_heap_update: tuple con
