Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PL/Java issues

2003-12-31 Thread Dave Cramer
Barry, Ok, so if we drop this limitation then we leave it up to the architect to manage the caching problem themselves. The class loader issue is interesting, this would mean that each object static or otherwise would not be able to overwrite others data. --dc-- On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 19:34, Barr

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PL/Java issues

2004-01-02 Thread Jan Wieck
Dave Cramer wrote: Barry, Ok, so if we drop this limitation then we leave it up to the architect to manage the caching problem themselves. Maybe I don't understand enough about Java, but isn't this limitation (only static methods callable) exactly what avoids having to deal with the call->insta

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PL/Java issues

2004-01-03 Thread Dave Cramer
Barry, Ok, so if we drop this limitation then we leave it up to the architect to manage the caching problem themselves. The class loader issue is interesting, this would mean that each object static or otherwise would not be able to overwrite others data. --dc-- On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 19:34, Barr