On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 02:21 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > John wanted us to allow use of the 'locale' and 'utf8' pragmas in trusted
> > code.
>
> You know, there's something twisted in postgres's naming scheme here. How is
> it that "trusted" langu
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John wanted us to allow use of the 'locale' and 'utf8' pragmas in trusted
> code.
You know, there's something twisted in postgres's naming scheme here. How is
it that "trusted" languages the ones that need a sandbox? and "untrusted"
languages the o
Bruce Momjian said:
>
> Uh, what was the TODO here? I forgot.
>
>
John wanted us to allow use of the 'locale' and 'utf8' pragmas in trusted
code. If there's a TODO it would be to investigate the possibility, as I am
very far from certain that there is a simple way to do it safely right now.
Maybe
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, what was the TODO here? I forgot.
I think we already did what we decided was safe there.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
Uh, what was the TODO here? I forgot.
---
John Hansen wrote:
> > I think it is *way* too late in the dev cycle to be proposing this.
> > Maybe it should be a TODO item - I at least don't have time even to
> > think about
> I think it is *way* too late in the dev cycle to be proposing this.
> Maybe it should be a TODO item - I at least don't have time even to
> think about the implications os using these pragmas. The effect of the
> first is achievable via an environment setting, I believe.
>
> If you need these
John Hansen wrote:
Applied, with changes to allow srand and disallow sprintf, as per
subsequent discussion.
How about allowing:
use utf8;
use locale;
?
I think it is *way* too late in the dev cycle to be proposing this.
Maybe it should be a TODO item - I at least don't have time even to
> Applied, with changes to allow srand and disallow sprintf, as per
> subsequent discussion.
How about allowing:
use utf8;
use locale;
?
Kind Regards,
John
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
ht
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It has just been brought to my attention that we are being very
> restrictive about what we allow to be done in trusted plperl.
> ...
> OK, based on this and some further thought, I have prepared the attached
> patch which does the right thing, I thin
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
--
> >Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >>...
> >>
> >>The patch also does some other inconsequential tidying of overlong
> >>lines, and removes some unnecessary ops in the unsafe case. These are
> >>basically cosmetic - the only significant part is replacing this:
> >>
> >>$PLContainer->permit(
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
An
12 matches
Mail list logo
