-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dave Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
Increased
company involvement
Dave,
The group has moderators, but they exist only
to moderate discussion on the mailing lists. I'm not saying that
it is bad that Postgres is not democratic. Postgres is a totally
different kind of beast than Boost, and probably benefits from
having a few people ultimately decide its
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:21 PM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
Increased
company
Bruce,
(P.S. on a complete tangent, call a spade a spade is actually a racist
expression originating in the reconstruction-era South. spade does
You must be from California. :-)
Well, yes. Actually, from San Francisco, which is even worse.And I just
spent the weekend in Orange
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
to get through.
I lose my share of arguments --- in fact, in the twenty minutes since
your posting I already notice Bruce committing a patch I had objected to
;-).
Our process is
Dave,
Well, I never said that core runs around saving the world. I
mostly made the point that core developers have special
influence,
Yep. Absolutely. I wanted to point out to you that core isn't the only
group within PostgreSQL that has special influence.
Which is also something that
On Monday 02 May 2005 14:49, Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce,
(P.S. on a complete tangent, call a spade a spade is actually a
racist expression originating in the reconstruction-era South.
spade does
You must be from California. :-)
Well, yes. Actually, from San Francisco, which is
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:33 PM
To: Dave Held
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
Increased
company involvement
[...]
Here is a new FAQ
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:50 PM
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
Increased
On Monday 02 May 2005 17:32, Dave Held wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:33 PM
To: Dave Held
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process
Robert Treat said:
* Engage the community by participating in discussions and patch
reviews - your credibility as a contributor depends on your
willingness to contribute to the community in non-coding
ways as well
Actually I think Bruces blurb is good for the general FAQ, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
