Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-28 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Zdenek Kotala wrote: I'm Sorry for confusion, I overlooked it. You have right. Unfortunately struct Port has been modified and by my opinion it means we must bump major version. See http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h.diff?r1=1.

Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: >> struct Port has been modified and by my opinion it means we must bump >> major version. See >> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h.diff?r1=1.62;r2=1.63 > That header file is *not* par

Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-28 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Zdenek Kotala wrote: Stephen Frost wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I'm for bumbing. Because if we use same number it also means that new binary will able to use old library. But if there are two new functions number must be increased. Standard practice how ELF loader w

Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-28 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > I'm Sorry for confusion, I overlooked it. You have right. Unfortunately > struct Port has been modified and by my opinion it means we must bump > major version. See > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h.diff?r1=1.62;r2=1.63 That head

Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-28 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Stephen Frost wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I'm for bumbing. Because if we use same number it also means that new binary will able to use old library. But if there are two new functions number must be increased. Standard practice how ELF loader works is following: Eac

Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-27 Thread Stephen Frost
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm for bumbing. Because if we use same number it also means that new > binary will able to use old library. But if there are two new functions > number must be increased. Standard practice how ELF loader works is > following: > > Each library cou

Re: [pgsql-packagers] [HACKERS] Getting to 8.3 beta1

2007-09-27 Thread Zdenek . Kotala
Tom Lane wrote: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom Lane wrote: * Do we bump the .so major version number for libpq? I think we should because there are two new exported functions since 8.2, and on at least some platforms there's nothing else than major number to disambigu