Re: AW: [HACKERS] F_SETLK is looking worse and worse...

2000-11-29 Thread Tom Lane
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> BTW, it also seems like a good idea to reorder the postmaster's >> startup operations so that the data-directory lockfile is checked >> before trying to acquire the port lockfile, instead of after. That >> way, in the common scenario where you

AW: [HACKERS] F_SETLK is looking worse and worse...

2000-11-29 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> BTW, it also seems like a good idea to reorder the postmaster's > startup operations so that the data-directory lockfile is checked > before trying to acquire the port lockfile, instead of after. That > way, in the common scenario where you're trying to start a second > postmaster in the same