So we need some good error numbering scheme. Any ideas?
SQL9x specifies some error codes, with no particular numbering scheme
other than negative numbers indicate a problem afaicr.
Shouldn't we map to those where possible?
Yes, it defines at least a few dozen char(5) error codes.
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
SQL9x specifies some error codes, with no particular numbering scheme
other than negative numbers indicate a problem afaicr.
Shouldn't we map to those where possible?
Yes, it defines at least a few dozen char(5) error codes. These are hierarchical,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: More on elog and error codes:
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
SQL9x specifies some error codes, with no particular numbering scheme
other than negative numbers indicate a problem afaicr.
Shouldn't we map to those where possible
