Re: Antw: Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql and multithreading

2002-10-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: On 18 Oct 2002 at 18:10, Ulrich Neumann wrote: I'm still VERY interested in giving those changes back to the community, but i think that my changes are still not wanted. Okay, can you submit such changes in pieces / steps? For instance, I

Re: Antw: Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql and multithreading

2002-10-19 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 18 Oct 2002 at 18:10, Ulrich Neumann wrote: Marc, not only the global variables are a problem. PostgreSQL doesn't clean up all the memory before a process terminates and you must deal with signals between threads. OK, first of all let me say this. I am interested in seeing postgresql

Antw: Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql and multithreading

2002-10-18 Thread Ulrich Neumann
Marc, not only the global variables are a problem. PostgreSQL doesn't clean up all the memory before a process terminates and you must deal with signals between threads. I've modified PostgreSQL that it is completely thread based and nearly clean with allocating/deallocating memory and I'm using