Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about an option to skip the sigaction calls for apps that can
> handle SIGPIPE?
If the app is ignoring SIGPIPE globally, then our calls will have no
effect anyway. I don't see that this proposal adds any security.
regards
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What we really want is to turn off SIGPIPE delivery on our socket
>> (only), but AFAIK there is no API to do that.
>>
> Linux has as MSG_NOSIGNAL flag for send(), but that seems to be Linux
> specific.
Hmm ... a Linux-specific solut
