Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-31 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? resurrected the install

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-30 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Stefan Kaltenbrunner píše v čt 29. 01. 2009 v 18:29 +0100: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Magnus Hagander wrote: On 29 jan 2009, at 05.35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Magnus Hagander
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: On 29 jan 2009, at 05.35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Magnus Hagander wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: On 29 jan 2009, at 05.35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? note the pieces part of my

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Josh Berkus
All, Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:18 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: All, Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that. I am not sure I agree with

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Josh Berkus
Josh, Someone submits patch ticket is created reviewer takes ticket comments submitter takes ticket fixes based on comments review takes ticket approves if reviewer is a committers, he commits. if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to need final review tickets that are in that state are

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-29 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: But that's *not* actually how we do things. So you're making my point. Well, the stuff around the wiki status board is pretty new and I don't think anyone feels that it's set in stone yet. The thing we don't want to compromise on, IMHO, is that the

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-28 Thread Magnus Hagander
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-28 Thread Cédric Villemain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Hagander a écrit : Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app

Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas escribió: I think that it would probably be pretty easy to write a webapp to replace the CommitFest web page that basically did the same thing but with a bit more structure around it - with database tables like commitfest, patch, patch_version, patch_comment, and patch_review. I

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: As for somewhere to host it, we certainly have some servers; not tons, but probably enough. Some of them even have Postgres running on it. We can certainly host an app under postgresql.org. The bigger issue will

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
Dave Page wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: As for somewhere to host it, we certainly have some servers; not tons, but probably enough. Some of them even have Postgres running on it. We can certainly host an app under postgresql.org.

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Marko Kreen
On 1/27/09, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: Robert Haas escribió: I think that it would probably be pretty easy to write a webapp to replace the CommitFest web page that basically did the same thing but with a bit more structure around it - with database tables like

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Haas
I have started some very trivial work around this a while ago with the intent to get something simple up and working before too much bike shedding is done. I'll contact Robert off-list to discuss that. If somebody else - who actively works with what we have now!! - is interested in that

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Brendan Jurd
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: I have started some very trivial work around this a while ago with the intent to get something simple up and working before too much bike shedding is done. I'll contact Robert off-list to discuss that. If somebody else -

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Haas
I think it's possible to skip the roll our own step in all of this and just move on to using a ready-made solution. In reality our requirements are very simple. Writing a low-fi version of the wiki would be pretty easy, but just dropping the patch data we already have into a patch tracker

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes: I think the picture has started to become more clear during the 8.4 dev cycle. Most importantly, there was much ado made about the need for powerful email integration features in previous discussions. This severely restricted our choices (possibly to

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom, The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have Um, no. It doesn't, and really can't. Notifying everyone who's updated the page isn't terribly useful. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Tom, The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have Um, no. It doesn't, and really can't. Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then?

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom, Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then? Notifies you when anyone makes any change of any kind to *any* patch (or piece of text, for that matter) in the commitfest. Including something like changing the number of patches assigned to an RRR. My inability to systematically

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Tom, Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then? Notifies you when anyone makes any change of any kind to *any* patch (or piece of text, for that matter) in the commitfest. Including something like changing the number of patches assigned to an

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane escribió: Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Tom, The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have Um, no. It doesn't, and really can't. Oh. What's that watch this page

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Marko Kreen
On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-)

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)

2009-01-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of