e-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rainer Mager
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [BUGS] Problem with 7.0.3 dump -> 7.1b4 restore
>
>
> I noticed that 7.1 has officially been
I noticed that 7.1 has officially been released. Does anyone know the status
of the bug I reported regarding encoding problems when dumping a 7.0 db an
restoring on 7.1?
Thanks,
--Rainer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe
t; From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [BUGS] Problem with 7.0.3 dump -> 7.1b4 restore
>
>
> > Attached is a single INSERT that shows the pr
> Attached is a single INSERT that shows the problem. The character after the
> word "Fiber" truncates the text when using JDBC. NOTE, the text IS in the
> database, that is, the dump/restore seems ok, the problem is when trying to
> read the text later. The database is UTF8 and I just tested with
> Attached is a single INSERT that shows the problem. The character after the
> word "Fiber" truncates the text when using JDBC. NOTE, the text IS in the
> database, that is, the dump/restore seems ok, the problem is when trying to
> read the text later. The database is UTF8 and I just tested with
Attached is a single INSERT that shows the problem. The character after the
word "Fiber" truncates the text when using JDBC. NOTE, the text IS in the
database, that is, the dump/restore seems ok, the problem is when trying to
read the text later. The database is UTF8 and I just tested with beta 5.
ECTED]]On Behalf Of Tatsuo Ishii
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 10:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Problem with 7.0.3 dump -> 7.1b4 restore
> This might be related to a known bug with 7.0.x. Can you grab a patch
> fr
> We have a Unicode (UTF-8) database that we are trying to upgrade to 7.1b4.
> We did a pg_dumpall (yes, using the old version) and then tried a restore.
> We hit the following 3 problems:
>
> 1. Some of the text is large, about 20k characters, and is multiline. For
> almost all of the lines this
