> > I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now,
> > and I doubt that this is the only bug lurking in it.
> > I think that we really ought to throw it away and start
> > over, because it doesn't look to me at all like a standard
> > deadlock-detection algorithm. The standard way of
> I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now, and I doubt
> that this is the only bug lurking in it. I think that we really ought
> to throw it away and start over, because it doesn't look to me at all
> like a standard deadlock-detection algorithm. The standard way of doing
Go ah
