On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> > used.
>
> That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
> that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm t
ED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry Rosenman
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
>
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> > used.
>
> That's difficult to b
Working on it.
Give me a couple of hours.
LER
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry Rosenman
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Olivier PRENANT <[EM
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> used.
That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior?
regards, to
