Just picking up a dropped thread, does anyone have a patch for this?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg01191.php
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pg
On 26 April 2010 11:19, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Is there any particular reason why the citext module doesn't have
> > citext_pattern_ops operator family?
>
> You forgot to send in the patch. :-)
>
> ...Robert
>
>
Yes, someone implementing thi
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why the citext module doesn't have
> citext_pattern_ops operator family?
You forgot to send in the patch. :-)
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
Rod Taylor wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why the citext module doesn't have
> citext_pattern_ops operator family?
>
> Specifically, I wish to index for this type of query:
>
> ... WHERE citext_column LIKE 'Foo%';
I think it is a reasonable suggestion.
=# \d tbl
Table "public.t