On 05/24/2012 11:44 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
It'd be great if one of standard utilities like pg_restore supported this,
by spawning every concurrent index build in separate backends. Just a
thought.
If parallel restore doesn't already take
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> It'd be great if one of standard utilities like pg_restore supported this,
> by spawning every concurrent index build in separate backends. Just a
> thought.
If parallel restore doesn't already take this into account when doing
job scheduli
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Gurjeet Singh (singh.gurj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Bruce points out the even simpler case is to build several indexes in
> > parallel over the same scan.
> >
> > I thought I had posted a patch to that effect long back, but upon
> sear
* Gurjeet Singh (singh.gurj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Bruce points out the even simpler case is to build several indexes in
> parallel over the same scan.
>
> I thought I had posted a patch to that effect long back, but upon searching
> my emails apparently I forgot about the patch.
>
> Attached
