Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Saturday 29 November 2008 00:52:03 Tom Lane wrote: > AFAICT, we are building both man.tar.gz and postgres.tar.gz on-the-fly > in current releases. At least, both of them have internal timestamps > supporting that theory in the official 8.3.5 and 8.2.11 tarballs, and > the contained files reflec

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-28 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 28 November 2008 18:25:23 Tom Lane wrote: >> Actually I think the ball is in Peter's court now. Marc updated the >> snapshot build script, but all the attempts are dying now because the >> new docbook2man part of the Makefiles doesn't work o

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Friday 28 November 2008 18:25:23 Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So how do we get Marc to fix this? > > Actually I think the ball is in Peter's court now. Marc updated the > snapshot build script, but all the attempts are dying now because the > new docbook2man

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-28 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So how do we get Marc to fix this? Actually I think the ball is in Peter's court now. Marc updated the snapshot build script, but all the attempts are dying now because the new docbook2man part of the Makefiles doesn't work on svr1.

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > no it is not the -HEAD situation is significantly worse because what we > are actually shipping as the manpages there are the ones from 7.4 ... > So how do we get Marc to fix this? -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > gmake VERSION=snapshot dist > > gmake maintainer-clean > > That can't be the right script --- the final "maintainer-clean" would > wipe out all the derived files made by the dist step. Also, it's > *definitely* not the script being

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-22 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: According to Stefan Kaltenbrunner, who took the time to delve into developer.pg.org guts, the script used to generate the snapshots looks like this /usr/bin/cvs -q export -rREL8_3_STABLE pgsql cd pgsql ./configure cd doc/src gmake pos

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-22 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to Stefan Kaltenbrunner, who took the time to delve into > developer.pg.org guts, the script used to generate the snapshots looks > like this > /usr/bin/cvs -q export -rREL8_3_STABLE pgsql > cd pgsql > ./configure > cd doc/src > gmake postgres

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Friday 21 November 2008 23:33:47 Tom Lane wrote: > > Historically the man.tar.gz files were created manually because there > > were some manual fixups needed to the generated man files. I'm not sure > > what vestiges of that still remain --- Peter's generally been the

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Friday 21 November 2008 23:33:47 Tom Lane wrote: > Historically the man.tar.gz files were created manually because there > were some manual fixups needed to the generated man files. I'm not sure > what vestiges of that still remain --- Peter's generally been the one to > take care of it. But w

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> ... the file >> that is actually being delivered in snapshots still contains man1/ >> and manl/. So that file needs to be regenerated. Peter? > Shouldn't it be part of the nightly snapshot creation to make that file? > In the snaps

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: It looks to me like the problem is that the makefile expects the man.tar.gz file to contain stuff in man1/ and man7/, but the file that is actually being delivered in snapshots still contains man1/ and manl/. So that file needs to be regenerated. Peter?

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jaime Casanova wrote: >> i saw the same on a nightly snapshot a week ago, then used cvs and >> everything was good... i thouhgt it was a problem already solved... >> could be a problem in the nightly builds? > Yeah. Buildfarm doesn't do docs at all. >

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Jaime Casanova wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:31 AM, ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I used a nightly snapshot(snapshot/postgresql-snapshot.tar.bz2) and it includes *.gz files. It would be the cause. i saw the same on a nightly snapshot a week ago, then used cvs and ev

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-21 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:31 AM, ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I used a nightly snapshot(snapshot/postgresql-snapshot.tar.bz2) > and it includes *.gz files. It would be the cause. > i saw the same on a nightly snapshot a week ago, then used cvs and everything was good... i thouhg

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-20 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This code would only be executed if you have a man.tar.gz in the doc > directory. If you do, it is probably an old one that indeed does not > contain the man7 directory. So delete the man.tar.gz (and build a new > one if you are so inclined). I

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: HEAD is failed to be built on win32 mingw. It requires manual 'mkdir man7' or so. Are there any changes in build process? Or am I missing something required to build? $ make /bin/sh.exe: man7/.timestamp: No such file or directory $ mkdir doc/man7<- HERE

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-19 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 08:51 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: >> HEAD is failed to be built on win32 mingw. >> It requires manual 'mkdir man7' or so. >> >> Are there any changes in build process? > It is probably because of this commit

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD build failure on win32 mingw

2008-11-19 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 08:51 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > HEAD is failed to be built on win32 mingw. > It requires manual 'mkdir man7' or so. > > Are there any changes in build process? It is probably because of this commit: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-11/msg00169.php