Ron Mayer wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, bug all the way back --- applied.
I don't much like the forced rounding to two digits here, but changing
that doesn't seem like material for back-patching. Are you going to
fix that up while working on your other patches?
Gladly. I hate that too.
Atta
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, bug all the way back --- applied.
I don't much like the forced rounding to two digits here, but changing
that doesn't seem like material for back-patching. Are you going to
fix that up while working on your other patches?
Gladly. I hate that too.
I think I can also re-f
Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to me there's a bug in HEAD (and probably old branches
> as well) when compiled with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP. As shown below
> It sometimes shows things like "-6.-70 secs" where 8.3
> showed "-6.70 secs".
> I think the attached one-liner patch fixes this
