On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
Make a hard state change from catchup to streaming mode.
More useful state change for monitoring pur
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 09:41 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> >> Make a hard state change from catchup to streaming mode.
> >> More useful state change for monitoring purposes, plus a
> >> required change for synchronous replication patch.
> >
> > As
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> We need a hard state change at one particular point to avoid sync rep
> requestors from hanging for hours when the standby is connected but a
> long way from being caught up.
That's a matter of opinion. I think there are a number of people h
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> Make a hard state change from catchup to streaming mode.
>>> More useful state change for monitoring purposes, plus a
>>> required change for synchronous replicatio
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Make a hard state change from catchup to streaming mode.
> >> More useful state change for monitoring purposes, plus a
> >> required change for synchronous replic
Robert Haas writes:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Make a hard state change from catchup to streaming mode.
>> More useful state change for monitoring purposes, plus a
>> required change for synchronous replication patch.
> As far as I can see, this patch was not poste
