Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> tom is away for the week, so I wouldn't see anything earlier hten the week >> following tha t... > I talked to him about that and we both feel this week while he is away > will be pretty quiet and the only major thing left is m

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > We are putting out beta3 today or tomorrow. It seems we are ready to > > start considering an RC1 date, perhaps next Friday, November 1? > > tom is away for the week, so I wouldn't see anything earlier hten the week >

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-26 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > ... and just out of curiosity, why does Bruce's message have a [HACKERS] > tag in the subject line but my reply does not? It seems to be going > through the same mailer but with different results... *puzzled look* both messages arrived here with the

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-26 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ... > > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? > > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the > mailing li

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-26 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > We are putting out beta3 today or tomorrow. It seems we are ready to > start considering an RC1 date, perhaps next Friday, November 1? tom is away for the week, so I wouldn't see anything earlier hten the week following tha t... > > ---

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ... > > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? > > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the > mailing lists, and so can not

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > ... and just out of curiosity, why does Bruce's message have a [HACKERS] > tag in the subject line but my reply does not? It seems to be going > through the same mailer but with different results... Yes, I have noticed this happening at random times. -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-25 Thread Thomas Lockhart
... and just out of curiosity, why does Bruce's message have a [HACKERS] tag in the subject line but my reply does not? It seems to be going through the same mailer but with different results... - Thomas ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-25 Thread Thomas Lockhart
Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The "supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ... Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the mailing lists, and so can not coordinate anything :( Not sure when or

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We are putting out beta3 today or tomorrow. It seems we are ready to > > start considering an RC1 date, perhaps next Friday, November 1? > > Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The > "supported platforms" list

Re: [HACKERS] Time for RC1 soon?

2002-10-25 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We are putting out beta3 today or tomorrow. It seems we are ready to > start considering an RC1 date, perhaps next Friday, November 1? Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The "supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...