Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
of CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of
Joe Conway said:
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary
builds of CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but
perhaps they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds of
CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on
my FC2 machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten
around to trying to rebuild on FC3.
If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
of CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
