Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2009 23:22:21 Todd A. Cook wrote:
The docs at
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-aggregate.html
don't prohibit using array values with array_arg(), so I assumed that it
would work.
test=> select array_agg(v.a) from (values (a
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 18:09:51 Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 1/20/09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > integer[] is "array of integer", in the way C deals with arrays. This
> > is also a main reason why composite types and arrays don't mix
> > orthogonally; there is no way to represent that in the
On 1/20/09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> integer[] is "array of integer", in the way C deals with arrays. This is
> also a main reason why composite types and arrays don't mix orthogonally;
> there is no way to represent that in the system catalogs.
What do you mean by this exactly? We've had a
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This would work much
> better if integer[][] where "array of integer[]", in the same way as
> integer[] is "array of integer", in the way C deals with arrays.
Well the situation in C is substantially more complicated than you
make out. I
On Monday 19 January 2009 23:22:21 Todd A. Cook wrote:
> The docs at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-aggregate.html
> don't prohibit using array values with array_arg(), so I assumed that it
> would work.
> test=> select array_agg(v.a) from (values (array[1,2]), (array[
