Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Added to TODO: * Rename /scripts directory because they are all C programs now --- Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How about just pulling them up a directory into src/bin? > > Nah, I don't lik

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-20 Thread Robert Treat
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:09, Jon Jensen wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? > > I would've found it handy, but didn't know about it and wrote my own in > Perl. Inside a transaction it drops the index then rebuilds it

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-19 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? > > I'd think it's still at least as useful as clusterdb. Why, are you > thinking of doing some work on it? No, I just noticed that it escaped the C conversion... Chris --

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-19 Thread Jon Jensen
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? I would've found it handy, but didn't know about it and wrote my own in Perl. Inside a transaction it drops the index then rebuilds it using what it gets from pg_get_indexdef(), and it looks at

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-18 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? I'd think it's still at least as useful as clusterdb. Why, are you thinking of doing some work on it? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-18 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that > that name seems very compelling either...) Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb any

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-18 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about just pulling them up a directory into src/bin? Nah, I don't like that. All the programs are at the same level in the src/bin tree, and I think it should stay that way. Bruce's idea of calling it "tools" seems reasonable ... although there might

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-18 Thread Rod Taylor
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:07, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in > > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was > > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that > > that name se

Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

2003-06-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that > that name seems very compelling either...) We could call it tools or a